Manajemen risiko keselamatan pandu laut dalam operasional tangga pandu di Pelabuhan Indonesia
Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang
Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang
Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v8i1.209Penelitian ini menggunakan desain Research and Development (R&D) untuk mengembangkan dan memvalidasi sistem manajemen risiko serta keselamatan kerja bagi pandu laut yang menggunakan pilot ladder di pelabuhan-pelabuhan Indonesia. Mengacu pada model pengembangan Borg & Gall (2023), data diperoleh melalui Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) terhadap 24 pandu laut di tiga pelabuhan utama, 94 observasi operasional kapal, analisis dokumen 47 insiden kecelakaan, serta metode Delphi yang divalidasi oleh 12 ahli melalui tiga putaran konsensus. Hasil penilaian risiko mengidentifikasi delapan tema risiko, di mana risiko jatuh dari tangga pandu ditetapkan sebagai risiko KRITIS (Probability = 4, Consequence = 5, Risk Priority Number/RPN = 20). Fase validasi Delphi mencapai konsensus sebesar 91,1% (Kendall’s W = 0,74; p < 0,001). Uji coba lapangan terhadap 46 pandu laut menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada skor pengetahuan keselamatan (dari 62,3 menjadi 81,5; p < 0,001) serta tingkat kepatuhan terhadap Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) (dari 59,1 menjadi 84,4; p < 0,001). Produk akhir berupa sistem manajemen risiko pertama yang divalidasi khusus bagi pandu laut di Indonesia, yang mencakup SOP Keselamatan Tangga Pandu dalam tujuh bab serta tiga modul pelatihan berbasis risiko.
This study employs a Research and Development (R&D) design to develop and validate a risk management and safety system for marine pilots utilizing pilot ladders in Indonesian ports. Based on the development model by Borg & Gall (2023), data were gathered through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) involving 24 marine pilots across three major ports, 94 ship operation observations, an analysis of 47 incident documents, and the Delphi method validated by 12 experts over three rounds. The risk assessment identified eight risk themes, with falling from the pilot ladder categorized as a CRITICAL risk (Probability = 4, Consequence = 5, Risk Priority Number/RPN = 20). The Delphi validation phase achieved a 91.1% consensus (Kendall’s W = 0.74; p < 0.001). Field trials involving 46 marine pilots demonstrated significant improvements in safety knowledge scores (from 62.3 to 81.5; p < 0.001) and compliance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) (from 59.1 to 84.4; p < 0.001). The resulting product is the first risk management system specifically designed and validated for marine pilots in Indonesia, consisting of a seven-chapter SOP on Pilot Ladder Safety and three risk-based training modules.
Keywords: Pandu Laut Pilot Ladder manajemen risiko mitigasi berbasis teknologi Keselamatan kerja Research and Development
Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 57 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemanduan Kapal. Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan.
Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
International Maritime Pilots' Association. (2023). Pilot ladder safety programme: Annual safety report 2023.
Schröder-Hinrichs, M., Hollnagel, C., Baldauf, M., Hofmann, S., & Kataria, A. (2022). From Titanic to Costa Concordia—A century of lessons not learned. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 12(2), 151–173.
Marine Accident Investigation Branch. (2021). Report on the investigation of marine accidents involving pilot transfers: 2016–2021.
Bielić, T., & Bereković, I. (2020). Marine pilot transfer incidents on Adriatic Sea: Analysis and recommendations. Transactions on Maritime Science, 9(2), 227–238.
Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Statistik Transportasi Laut Indonesia 2022.
International Maritime Organization. (2015). Resolution A.1108(29): Recommendations on Pilot Transfer Arrangements.
International Maritime Organization. (2021). Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1331 (2021 Update): Guidelines for the Safe Transfer of Persons at Sea.
Fridolf, K., Nilsson, D., & Frantzich, H. (2014). The flow rate of people during train evacuation in rail tunnels: Effects of different train exit configurations. Safety Science, 62, 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.008.
Agustina, R., & Kurniawan, B. (2022). Fatigue assessment among harbour pilots in Indonesian major ports using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Jurnal Keselamatan Maritim Indonesia, 8(2), 45–61.
Pradhana, A. R., Santosa, B., & Nurhidayati, E. (2021). Risk assessment of harbour pilot operations at Tanjung Priok Port using risk matrix approach. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Pencegahan Pencemaran Industri, 12(1), 1–12.
Acejo, I., Sampson, N., Turgo, L., Ellis, R., & Tang, N. (2022). The causes of maritime accidents in the period 2002–2016. SIRC Symposium, Cardiff University.
Syafitri, D., Pratama, I., & Wijayanto, H. (2020). Analisis kondisi tangga monyet di pelabuhan-pelabuhan Indonesia terhadap standar SOLAS. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 32(2), 127–140.
Alac, R., Hammad, A. W., Hadigheh, A., & Opdyke, A. (2023). Optimising egress location in school buildings using mathematical modelling and agent-based simulation. Safety Science, 167, 106265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106265.
Hollnagel, E. (2023). Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Reason, J. T. (2021). The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Ashgate Publishing.
Lee, J. S., Shin, J. H., & Park, Y. K. (2023). Sensemaking processes in maritime pilotage: A cognitive task analysis study. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(4), 512–529.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2021). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues (2nd ed.). Routledge.
McKay, M., & Praetorius, G. (2022). Developing procedural safety systems for maritime operations: A R&D methodology for contextual SOP development. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 236(3), 612–628.
Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. (2023). Educational research: An introduction (9th ed.). Pearson.
Smith, J. A., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2008). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis: A practical guide to method and research. Sage Publications.
Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. (2023). Educational research: An introduction (9th ed.). Pearson.
Smith, J. A., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2008). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis: A practical guide to method and research. Sage Publications.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2021). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
