Manajemen risiko keselamatan pandu laut dalam operasional tangga pandu di Pelabuhan Indonesia
Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang
Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang
Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v8i1.209Penelitian ini menggunakan desain Research and Development (R&D) untuk mengembangkan dan memvalidasi sistem manajemen risiko serta keselamatan kerja bagi pandu laut yang menggunakan pilot ladder di pelabuhan-pelabuhan Indonesia. Mengacu pada model pengembangan Borg & Gall (2023), data diperoleh melalui Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) terhadap 24 pandu laut di tiga pelabuhan utama, 94 observasi operasional kapal, analisis dokumen 47 insiden kecelakaan, serta metode Delphi yang divalidasi oleh 12 ahli melalui tiga putaran konsensus. Hasil penilaian risiko mengidentifikasi delapan tema risiko, di mana risiko jatuh dari tangga pandu ditetapkan sebagai risiko KRITIS (Probability = 4, Consequence = 5, Risk Priority Number/RPN = 20). Fase validasi Delphi mencapai konsensus sebesar 91,1% (Kendall’s W = 0,74; p < 0,001). Uji coba lapangan terhadap 46 pandu laut menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada skor pengetahuan keselamatan (dari 62,3 menjadi 81,5; p < 0,001) serta tingkat kepatuhan terhadap Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) (dari 59,1 menjadi 84,4; p < 0,001). Produk akhir berupa sistem manajemen risiko pertama yang divalidasi khusus bagi pandu laut di Indonesia, yang mencakup SOP Keselamatan Tangga Pandu dalam tujuh bab serta tiga modul pelatihan berbasis risiko.
This study employs a Research and Development (R&D) design to develop and validate a risk management and safety system for marine pilots utilizing pilot ladders in Indonesian ports. Based on the development model by Borg & Gall (2023), data were gathered through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) involving 24 marine pilots across three major ports, 94 ship operation observations, an analysis of 47 incident documents, and the Delphi method validated by 12 experts over three rounds. The risk assessment identified eight risk themes, with falling from the pilot ladder categorized as a CRITICAL risk (Probability = 4, Consequence = 5, Risk Priority Number/RPN = 20). The Delphi validation phase achieved a 91.1% consensus (Kendall’s W = 0.74; p < 0.001). Field trials involving 46 marine pilots demonstrated significant improvements in safety knowledge scores (from 62.3 to 81.5; p < 0.001) and compliance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) (from 59.1 to 84.4; p < 0.001). The resulting product is the first risk management system specifically designed and validated for marine pilots in Indonesia, consisting of a seven-chapter SOP on Pilot Ladder Safety and three risk-based training modules.
Keywords: Pandu Laut Pilot Ladder manajemen risiko mitigasi berbasis teknologi Keselamatan kerja Research and Development
Acejo. I., Sampson. N., Turgo. L., Ellis. R., & Tang. N. (2022). The causes of maritime accidents in the period 2002–2016. Dalam SIRC Symposium. Cardiff University.
Agustina, R., & Kurniawan, B. (2022). Fatigue assessment among harbour pilots in Indonesian major ports using Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Jurnal Keselamatan Maritim Indonesia, 8(2), 45–61.
Alac, R., WA Hammad, A., Hadigheh, A., & Opdyke, A. (2023). Optimising egress location in school buildings using mathematical modelling and Agent-Based simulation. Safety Science, 167, 106265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106265
Bhattacharya, C., Malhotra, N., & Majumdar, D. (2023). Operational pressures in maritime pilotage: A comparative study across Asia-Pacific. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 25(1), 88–107.
Bielić and. T., & Bereković. I. (2020). Marine pilot transfer incidents on Adriatic Sea: Analysis and recommendations. Trans. Marit. Sci., 9(2), 227–238.
Borg. W. R., Gall. M. D., & Gall. J. P. (2023). Educational Research: An Introduction (9th ed.). Pearson.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dekker, Sidney. (2018). The safety anarchist : relying on human expertise and innovation, reducing bureaucracy and compliance. Routledge.
Flin, R., O’Connor, P., & Crichton, M. (2017). Safety at the Sharp End. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315607467
Fridolf, K., Nilsson, D., & Frantzich, H. (2014). The flow rate of people during train evacuation in rail tunnels: Effects of different train exit configurations. Safety Science, 62, 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.008
Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hollnagel. E. (2023). Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management (2nd ed). CRC Press.
Hollnagel, Erik., Woods, D. D. ., & Leveson, Nancy. (2006). Resilience Engineering : Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Pub.
IMO. (2015). Resolution A.1108(29): Recommendations on Pilot Transfer Arrangements.
IMO. (2021). Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1331 (2021 Update): Guidelines for the Safe Transfer of Persons at Sea.
IMPA. (2022). Annual Incident Report 2022: Pilot Ladder and Transfer Incidents.
IMPA. (2023). Pilot ladder safety programme — Annual safety report 2023.
International Association of Classification Societies (IACS). (2021). Recommendation No. 68 Rev.2 — Pilot Transfer Arrangements.
ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 — Risk Management: Guidelines.
Kementerian Perhubungan RI. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 57 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemanduan Kapal.
Kementerian Perhubungan RI. (2022). Statistik Transportasi Laut Indonesia 2022.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee. J. S., Shin. J. H., & Park. Y. K. (2023). Sensemaking processes in maritime pilotage: A cognitive task analysis study. Marit. Policy Manag., 50(4), 512–529.
Linstone. H. A., & Turoff. M. (2021). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
Lützhöft, M. H., & Dekker, S. W. A. (2002). On Your Watch: Automation on the Bridge. Journal of Navigation, 55(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463301001588
Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB). (2021). Report on the Investigation of Marine Accidents Involving Pilot Transfers: 2016–2021.
McKay. M., & Praetorius. G. (2022). Developing procedural safety systems for maritime operations: A R&D methodology for contextual SOP development. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. M J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 236(3), 612–628.
Nasir. M., & Fadillah. A. R. (2019). Sistem pemanduan kapal di Selat Malaka: Analisis kompetensi dan keselamatan pandu laut. Jurnal Transportasi Laut, 1(2), 88–102.
Pradhana. A. R., Santosa. B., & Nurhidayati. E. (2021). Risk assessment of harbour pilot operations at Tanjung Priok Port using risk matrix approach. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Pencegahan Pencemaran Industri, 12(1), 1–12.
Reason. J. T. (2021). The Human Contribution: Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries. Ashgate Publishing.
Richey. R. C., & Klein. J. D. (2021). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Salas, E., Cooke, N. J., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008). Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(6), 903–933. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X375009
Schröder-Hinrichs. M., Hollnagel. C., Baldauf. M., Hofmann. S., & Kataria. A. (2022). From Titanic to Costa Concordia — a century of lessons not learned. WMU J. Marit. Aff., 12(2), 151–173.
Smith, J. A. ., Larkin, Michael., & Flowers, Paul. (2008). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis : a practical guide to method and application. SAGE.
Snook, S. A. . (2011). Friendly Fire : the Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton University Press.
Ssenyonga. A. N., Barnett.T., & Lockton.K. (2023). Toward a framework for understanding maritime pilot competencies: A qualitative exploration. Work, 75(3), 918–932.
Syafitri. D., Pratama. I., & Wijayanto. H. (2020). Analisis kondisi tangga monyet di pelabuhan-pelabuhan Indonesia terhadap standar SOLAS. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 32(2), 127–140.
Vaughan, D. (1997). The Challenger Launch Decision. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226346960.001.0001
