Studi kasus keterlambatan bongkar muat di pelabuhan dan dampaknya terhadap logistik di PT. Krakatau Bandar Samudra banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Kantor Kesyahbandaran dan Otoritas Pelabuhan Kelas I Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v8i1.188Kegiatan bongkar muat di pelabuhan merupakan salah satu mata rantai krusial dalam sistem logistik nasional. Efisiensi proses ini sangat menentukan kelancaran arus barang, efektivitas biaya operasional, serta keandalan rantai pasok industri. Namun, keterlambatan bongkar muat masih sering terjadi dan berpotensi meningkatkan biaya logistik, mengganggu operasional industri, hingga menurunkan daya saing perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor penyebab keterlambatan bongkar muat serta dampaknya terhadap sistem logistik di PT Krakatau Bandar Samudra (KBS) Banten. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus, didukung oleh data primer yang diperoleh melalui observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner terhadap 75 responden. Analisis data kuantitatif dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak SPSS melalui uji validitas, reliabilitas, normalitas, korelasi Pearson, serta regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor teknis, sumber daya manusia (SDM), administratif, dan cuaca berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keterlambatan bongkar muat. Faktor teknis menjadi variabel paling dominan (Beta=0,402; Sig=0,000), diikuti oleh faktor SDM, administratif, dan cuaca. Secara simultan, seluruh variabel memberikan pengaruh signifikan (Sig=0,000) dengan nilai koefisien determinasi (R^2) sebesar 0,490. Keterlambatan bongkar muat terbukti berdampak langsung terhadap logistik, yaitu menyebabkan kongesti pelabuhan, peningkatan biaya demurrage dan storage, serta terganggunya jadwal distribusi industri. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan keandalan peralatan melalui preventive maintenance, penguatan kompetensi SDM, digitalisasi administrasi pelayanan kapal, serta penguatan sistem mitigasi cuaca guna meningkatkan efisiensi operasional dan kinerja rantai pasok di PT Krakatau Bandar Samudra Banten.
Loading and unloading activities at ports are a critical link in the national logistics system. The efficiency of these processes significantly determines the flow of goods, operational cost-effectiveness, and industrial supply chain reliability. However, loading and unloading delays still occur, potentially increasing logistics costs, disrupting industrial operations, and reducing company competitiveness. This study aims to analyze the factors causing these delays and their impact on the logistics system at PT Krakatau Bandar Samudra (KBS), Banten. A descriptive approach with a case study method was employed, supported by primary data gathered through observation, interviews, and questionnaires from 75 respondents. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS through validity, reliability, normality, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression tests. The results indicate that technical factors, human resources (HR), administrative, and weather factors significantly affect loading and unloading delays. Technical factors are the most dominant (Beta=0.402; Sig=0.000), followed by HR, administrative, and weather factors. Simultaneously, all factors have a significant effect (Sig=0.000) with an R^2 value of 0.490. These delays are proven to have a direct negative impact on logistics, causing port congestion, increased demurrage and storage costs, and disruptions to industrial distribution schedules. This study recommends improving equipment reliability through preventive maintenance, strengthening HR competencies, digitalizing vessel service administration, and enhancing weather mitigation systems to improve operational efficiency and supply chain performance at PT Krakatau Bandar Samudra Banten.
Keywords: Bongkar Muat Keterlambatan Logistik Pelabuhan PT Krakatau Bandar Samudra
Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge.
Song, D. W., & Panayides, P. M. (2008). Global supply chain and port/terminal: integration and competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(1), 73-87.
Weerasinghe, B. A., Perera, H. N., & Bai, X. (2024). Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 26(2), 307-341.
Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405-424.
Adolf, K. N., & Liu, J. J. (2014). Port-Focal Logistics: The Ideal for Future Global Supply Chains?. In Port-Focal Logistics and Global Supply Chains (pp. 200-208). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Handayani, N. P., & Hutabarat, Z. (2026). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Productivity of Domestic Ship Loading and Unloading at Tanjung Priok Port. Waterlines, 44(1s), 200-217.
Patampang, F., & Mokodompit, E. A. (2025). Integrasi Transportasi Laut Dalam Global Supply Chain: Kajian Literatur Mengenai Efisiensi, Keberlanjutan, Dan Daya Saing. EKONOMIKA45: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan, 13(1), 457-468.
Kementerian Perindustrian Republik Indonesia. (2015). Rencana Induk Pembangunan Industri Nasional (RIPIN) 2015-2035. Jakarta: Kemenperin RI.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, Canada: Sage.
Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333-339.
Mallette, L. A., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Teaching qualitative data analysis through gaming. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9-10), 1085-1090.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods, 9th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. London: Cengage Learning.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS, 7th ed. London: Routledge.
UNCTAD. (2023). Review of Maritime Transport 2023. New York: United Nations Publication.
Talley, W. K. (2017). Port Economics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The sustainability balanced scorecard: A systematic review of architectures. Journal of business ethics, 133(2), 193-221.
Bichou, K. (2009). Port Operations, Planning and Logistics. London: Informa Law from Routledge.
Song, D., & Panayides, P. (2021). Maritime Logistics: A Guide to Contemporary Shipping and Port Management, 3rd ed. London: Kogan Page.
World Bank. (2023). The Container Port Performance Index 2022: A Comparable Assessment of Container Port Performance. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsalis, T. A. (2013). Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecological Indicators, 34, 76-86.
Razan, N. (2025). Analisis Pustaka: Hubungan Logistik, Energi, dan Kebijakan Maritim. Jurnal Cakrawala Bahari, 8(2), 78-89.
Parola, F., Satta, G., Notteboom, T., & Persico, L. (2020). Revisiting traffic forecasting by port authorities in the context of port planning and development. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23(3), 444.
