Efektivitas digitalisasi proses impor Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai dalam penguatan pengawasan rokok ilegal di Indonesia
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v7i2.173Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas digitalisasi proses impor yang diterapkan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai (DJBC) dalam memperkuat pengawasan terhadap peredaran rokok ilegal di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder yang bersumber dari laporan resmi DJBC, publikasi pemerintah, serta dokumen kebijakan terkait digitalisasi kepabeanan dan penindakan barang kena cukai. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif dan komparatif dengan membandingkan kinerja pengawasan sebelum dan setelah penerapan sistem digital kepabeanan, seperti Customs-Excise Information System and Automation (CEISA), electronic seal (e-seal), Auto Gate System, serta teknologi pemindaian berbasis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa digitalisasi proses impor terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan akurasi pengawasan, efisiensi administrasi, serta kualitas penindakan terhadap rokok ilegal. Hal ini tercermin dari peningkatan signifikan jumlah rokok ilegal yang disita, meskipun jumlah penindakan secara kuantitas mengalami penurunan, yang mengindikasikan peningkatan kualitas dan ketepatan sasaran pengawasan. Selain itu, digitalisasi berkontribusi pada peningkatan transparansi layanan kepabeanan dan penguatan sinergi lintas instansi. Namun demikian, penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi tantangan berupa keterbatasan infrastruktur teknologi dan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, yang masih perlu ditingkatkan untuk memastikan keberlanjutan efektivitas sistem digital kepabeanan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi rujukan akademik dan kebijakan dalam pengembangan sistem kepabeanan berbasis digital guna memperkuat pengawasan barang kena cukai dan melindungi penerimaan negara.
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of import process digitalization implemented by the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE) in strengthening the supervision of illegal cigarette distribution in Indonesia. The research adopts a quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from official DGCE reports, government publications, and policy documents related to customs digitalization and excisable goods enforcement. Data analysis is conducted through descriptive and comparative methods by examining supervisory performance before and after the implementation of digital customs systems, including the Customs-Excise Information System and Automation (CEISA), electronic seals (e-seal), Auto Gate Systems, and data-based scanning technologies. The findings indicate that import process digitalization has proven effective in enhancing monitoring accuracy, administrative efficiency, and the quality of enforcement against illegal cigarettes. This effectiveness is reflected in a significant increase in the volume of seized illegal cigarettes, despite a decrease in the number of enforcement actions, suggesting improved targeting and enforcement precision. Furthermore, digitalization contributes to greater transparency in customs services and stronger inter-agency coordination. Nevertheless, challenges remain, particularly related to technological infrastructure limitations and human resource capacity, which require further improvement to ensure the sustainable effectiveness of digital customs systems. This study is expected to serve as an academic and policy reference for advancing digital-based customs systems to strengthen excisable goods supervision and safeguard state revenue.
Keywords: Digitalisasi kepabeanan proses impor efektivitas pengawasan rokok ilegal Bea dan Cukai
World Customs Organization. (2022). International Customs Day: Previous editions. Brussels: WCO.
World Customs Organization, & World Trade Organization. (2022). Study report on disruptive technologies. Geneva: WTO.
World Customs Organization. (2021). Making digital collaboration possible: The WCO data model. WCO Magazine, (90), 12–18.
World Customs Organization. (2023). Study on the digitalization of certificates of origin. Brussels: WCO.
Ardana, B. Y. (2025). Customs digitalization and excise enforcement performance. World Customs Journal, 19(1), 45–60.
Center for Indonesia’s Strategic Development Initiatives. (2024). Illicit cigarette trade in Indonesia. Jakarta: CISDI.
Framework for National Monitoring. (2025). Policy brief on tobacco excise control. Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. (2024). Laporan tahunan DJBC 2023. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. (2025). Laporan penindakan rokok ilegal tahun 2025. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
Nugroho, A., Retnandari, N. D., & Djunaedi, A. (2023). Factors influencing customs digitalization in Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Bea dan Cukai, 7(2), 213–236.
Panggabean, R. (2023). Effectiveness of joint inspection in customs clearance. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 88–101.
Desita, H. (2023). Impact of excise tariff increase on illegal cigarette circulation. Journal of Public Finance, 11(2), 120–134.
Alamsyah, A. R., Purwanto, A., & Saputra, T. D. (2024). Optimization of CEISA 4.0 online services in customs administration. Jurnal Matemar: Manajemen dan Teknologi Maritim, 5(2), 55–67.
Andianto, Y. D., Sunarya, A., Sholichah, N., Roekminiati, S., & Pramono, S. (2025). Digital public service innovation in customs administration. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), 96–112.
Vijayakumar, S. (2024). Technology-centric and data-driven customs risk management. World Customs Journal, 18(2), 33–48.
International Monetary Fund. (2024). Understanding AI in tax and customs administration. Washington, DC: IMF.
Dangsawang, B., et al. (2024). A machine learning approach for customs fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121–135.
Reason, J. (2007). Organizational factors in accident causation. Safety Science, 45(1), 3–15.
Antão, A., & Guedes Soares, C. (2018). Human factors and safety management in maritime and customs operations. Safety Science, 110, 253–263.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Illicit trade: Converging criminal networks. Paris: OECD Publishing.
World Bank. (2022). Customs modernization handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Customs Organization. (2021). Risk management compendium. Brussels: WCO.
World Customs Organization. (2020). Customs in the 21st century. Brussels: WCO.
Papoutsidakis, J. (2022). Digital transformation and governance in public organizations. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(3), 415–430.
Zhang, P., et al. (2020). Decision support systems in customs and maritime operations. Maritime Technology and Research, 2(1), 22–35.
Zeng, F., et al. (2022). Digital transformation in logistics and customs management. Transportation Research Part E, 160, 102–118.
Borovnik, M. (2023). Global labour mobility and governance. Journal of Transport Geography, 109, 103–117.
De Beukelaer, C., Brijs, I., & Vanelslander, T. (2021). Border control and crisis response in maritime transport. Marine Policy, 129, 104–112.
Psarros, G. N., et al. (2021). Risk management in public sector enforcement. Safety Science, 134, 105–118.
Transparency International. (2025). Tobacco industry interference index. Berlin: Transparency International.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Babbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Evaluating public sector digital transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
World Health Organization. (2023). Illicit trade in tobacco products. Geneva: WHO.
Knapp, F., & Hassel, H. (2017). Benchmarking safety and compliance performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(6), 739–755.
Bryman, A. (2020). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
World Customs Organization. (2022). Performance measurement framework. Brussels: WCO.
Papoutsidakis, J. (2019). ERP-based management systems in public organizations. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(5), 620–635.
Yin, R. K. (2020). Policy evaluation methods. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 623–632.
Zhang, D., & Wang, L. (2019). Digital enforcement systems in customs operations. Computers in Industry, 108, 64–75.
Rossi, P. H. (2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Digital government review: Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publishing.
International Monetary Fund. (2023). Public sector digital capacity. Washington, DC: IMF.
World Customs Journal Editorial Board. (2025). Measuring enforcement effectiveness in customs operations. World Customs Journal, 19(2), 1–15.
Zurn, S. (2024). Quality-based enforcement models in public administration. Journal of Policy Analysis, 41(3), 455–470.
Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2019). Competing on analytics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Data-driven public administration. Paris: OECD Publishing.
World Customs Organization. (2021). Risk-based customs control. Brussels: WCO.
Jensen, J., et al. (2018). Risk profiling and compliance performance. Marine Policy, 98, 1–9.
Lakoro, A. (2024). Kontribusi Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko Terhadap Penyederhanaan Prosedur Administrasi Perizinan Di Gorontalo. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 2(1), 1-14.
United Nations. (2022). Digital government transformation. New York: United Nations.
World Bank. (2021). Governance and digital transparency. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Heeks, R. (2020). Implementing e-government. London: Routledge.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Public sector innovation review. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Janssen, M., et al. (2020). Interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101–115.
World Customs Organization. (2022). Capacity building strategy. Brussels: WCO.
International Labour Organization. (2023). Digital skills for the public sector. Geneva: ILO.
