Analisis kepuasan perusahaan pelayaran terhadap kinerja kadet Politeknik Pelayaran Banten selama Praktik Laut
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v7i2.159Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepuasan perusahaan pelayaran terhadap kinerja kadet Politeknik Pelayaran Banten selama pelaksanaan praktik laut. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif deskriptif dengan pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner berbasis skala Likert yang disebarkan kepada 141 responden, terdiri atas staf rekrutmen perusahaan pelayaran dan perwira pembina di kapal. Kinerja kadet dievaluasi melalui enam dimensi utama, yaitu pengetahuan dan keterampilan teknis, sikap dan etika kerja, keselamatan dan keamanan, kemampuan manajerial dan kepemimpinan, keterampilan interpersonal, serta pengembangan diri dan profesionalisme. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan statistik deskriptif berbasis persentase dan regresi linier untuk mengidentifikasi kontribusi masing-masing dimensi terhadap tingkat kepuasan perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kepuasan perusahaan pelayaran berada pada kategori sangat baik, dengan nilai rata-rata keseluruhan 87,47%. Dimensi pengetahuan dan keterampilan teknis memiliki pengaruh paling signifikan terhadap kepuasan perusahaan, diikuti oleh sikap dan etika kerja. Meskipun demikian, beberapa aspek masih memerlukan peningkatan, khususnya pemahaman hukum maritim, pengambilan keputusan dalam situasi kritis, serta kebiasaan pengembangan diri secara profesional. Temuan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi penguatan kurikulum dan strategi pembelajaran praktik laut guna meningkatkan kesiapan lulusan dalam memenuhi kebutuhan industri pelayaran.
This study aims to analyze shipping companies’ satisfaction with the performance of cadets from the Banten Shipping Polytechnic during sea training. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed, with data collected through Likert-scale questionnaires distributed to 141 respondents, consisting of recruitment staff from shipping companies and supervising officers on board. Cadet performance was assessed based on six key dimensions: technical knowledge and skills, work attitude and ethics, safety and security, managerial and leadership abilities, interpersonal skills, and self-development and professionalism. Data were analyzed using percentage-based descriptive statistics and linear regression analysis to examine the contribution of each dimension to overall company satisfaction. The findings indicate that shipping companies’ satisfaction with cadet performance falls within the very high category, with an overall average score of 87.47%. Among the evaluated dimensions, technical knowledge and skills exert the strongest influence on company satisfaction, followed by work attitude and ethics. However, several areas require further improvement, particularly in maritime law comprehension, decision-making under critical conditions, and continuous professional development. These results highlight the importance of strengthening sea-training curricula and instructional strategies to better align maritime vocational education with industry expectations.
Keywords: Kepuasan perusahaan pelayaran kinerja kadet praktik laut pendidikan vokasi maritim Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Wróbel, K., Montewka, J., & Kujala, E. (2017). Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 165, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.029.
Alderton, T. (2004). The global seafarer: Living and working conditions in a globalized industry. International Labour Organization.
Bye, R. J., Holmen, I. M., & Størkersen, K. V. (2021). Safety in marine and maritime operations: Uniting systems and practice. Safety science, 139, 105249.
De Beukelaer, C. (2021). COVID-19 border closures cause humanitarian crew change crisis at sea. Marine Policy, 132, 104661.
Soares, C. G., & Santos, T. A. (Eds.). (2024). Advances in maritime technology and engineering. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Arslan, V., Kurt, R. E., Turan, O., & De Wolff, L. (2016). Safety culture assessment and implementation framework to enhance maritime safety. Transportation research procedia, 14, 3895-3904.
Puisa, R., Lin, L., Bolbot, V., & Vassalos, D. (2018). Unravelling causal factors of maritime incidents and accidents. Safety science, 110, 124-141.
Haugen, S., & Kristiansen, S. (2022). Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Routledge.
Wu, B., & Winchester, N. (2005). Crew study of seafarers: a methodological approach to the global labour market for seafarers. Marine Policy, 29(4), 323-330.
Dar, H., Kamal, M., Tanahy, E., & Salem, D. (2021). Offshore Vessels employees' perception of Housekeeping Service: Impact on Job Satisfaction and Productivity. The Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Alexandria University, 18(2), 181-201.
Edmunds, C. E., Harris, A. J., & Osman, M. (2022). Applying insights on categorisation, communication, and dynamic decision-making: a case study of a ‘simple’maritime military decision. Review of General Psychology, 26(4), 426-445.
Tang, L., & Zhang, P. (2021). Human resource management in shipping: Issues, challenges, and solutions. Routledge.
Bhattacharya, Y. (2015). Measuring safety culture on ships using safety climate: a study among Indian officers. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 3, 51-70.
Ozbas, B. (2013). Safety risk analysis of maritime transportation: review of the literature. Transportation research record, 2326(1), 32-38.
Hollnagel, E. (2014). Human factors/ergonomics as a systems discipline?“The human use of human beings” revisited. Applied ergonomics, 45(1), 40-44.
Rothblum, A. M. (2000, March). Human error and marine safety. In National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando, FL (Vol. 7).
Alimen, R., Jaleco, V., Pador, R., & Sequio, M. (2013). Stakeholders’ Satisfaction: Response to Global Excellence. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters, 213-217.
Pallis, A. A., Vitsounis, T. K., De Langen, P. W., & Notteboom, T. E. (2011). Port economics, policy and management: Content classification and survey. Transport Reviews, 31(4), 445-471.
Parasuraman, A. B. L. L., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988, 64(1), 12-40.
Osman, A. R., Sohel-Uz-Zaman, A. S. M., Ashraf, M. A., & Uddin, A. (2020). Vindicating Service Quality of Education through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM): International Students' Perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 158-172.
Subramony, M., & Rosenbaum, M. S. (2024). SDG commentary: economic services for work and growth for all humans. Journal of Services Marketing, 38(2), 190-216.
Galaş, C., Kara, K., & Kaygısız, E. G. (2025). Gemi Adamlarında Duygusal Tükenme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Bir Araştırma. MEMBA Su Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(3), 282-301.
Zhang, P., & Tang, L. (2021). Ship management: theory and practice. Routledge.
Malau, A. G., Purnama, C., & Simanjuntak, M. B. (2025). Developing Competency-Based Maritime Education for the Digital Age. Journal of Maritime Research, 22(1), 100-106.
Fan, L., Fei, J., Schriever, U., & Fan, S. (2017). The communicative competence of Chinese seafarers and their employability in the international maritime labour market. Marine Policy, 83, 137-145.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Nazir, S., Øvergård, K. I., & Yang, Z. (2015). Towards effective training for process and maritime industries. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1519-1526.
Autsadee, Y., Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N. H., & Othman, M. R. (2024). Digital wind of changes: navigating competitiveness in the maritime sector through the transformation in human resource development. Maritime Business Review, 9(3), 204-228.
Ng, A. K., Koo, A. C., & Pallis, A. A. (2011). Professionalization of the shipping industry via postgraduate education. Ocean & coastal management, 54(5), 364-373.
Perra, V. M., & Boile, M. (2025). Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Sustainable Maritime Spatial Planning: A Stakeholder-Driven Approach. Sustainability, 17(13), 5813.
Lin, W. C., & Cheng, H. H. (2021). Improving maritime safety through enhancing marine process management: The application of balanced scorecard. Management Decision, 59(3), 604-615.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for further research. Journal of marketing, 58(1), 111-124.
Wróbel, K., Montewka, J., & Kujala, E. (2018). Safety implications for maritime transportation. Marine Policy, 98, 1–9.
Markkula, J. (2021). Containing mobilities: Changing time and space of maritime labor. Focaal, 2021(89), 25-39.
Galieriková, A. (2019). The human factor and maritime safety. Transportation research procedia, 40, 1319-1326.
Milch, V., & Laumann, K. (2016). Interorganizational complexity and organizational accident risk: A literature review. Safety science, 82, 9-17.
Yuen, K. F., Bai, X., & Wang, X. (2020). Safety behaviour at sea: Policy implications for managing seafarers through positive psychology. Marine Policy, 121, 104163.
Djukanović, N., Hodges-Smikle, R., Xuan, J. L. J., & Sambuy, P. (2020). Science of perception, decision making and fatigue in the maritime industry. Progress in brain research, 253, 1-16.
Morrison, A. M., & Buhalis, D. (Eds.). (2024). Routledge handbook of trends and issues in tourism sustainability, planning and development, management, and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Geron, G. (2024). Career attractions and challenges among active seafarers. International Journal of Research, 13(8), 27-50.
Renganayagalu, S. K., Mallam, S. C., & Hernes, M. (2022). Maritime education and training in the COVID-19 era and beyond. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 16(1), 59-69.
Oldenburg, M., Hogan, B., & Jensen, H. J. (2013). Systematic review of maritime field studies about stress and strain in seafaring. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 86(1), 1-15.
Chen, Y., Wang, X., & Xu, H. (2021). Human factors/ergonomics evaluation for virtual reality headsets: a review. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction, 3(2), 99-111.
Sinaga, O. H., & Sembiring, F. M. (2025). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Kesehatan, dan Manajemen Konflik Terhadap Keselamatan Terbang Air Crew di Skadron 13/Amur Balottama Yudha. Portofolio: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 22(1), 108-127.
Xue, H., Røds, J. F., Haugseggen, Ø., Christensen, A. J., Batalden, B. M., & Gudmestad, O. T. (2024). A study on the effects of rapid training method related to ship handling in decision-making skills under stressful situations. The Journal of Navigation, 77(3), 395-414.
Singh, M. P., & Raju, T. B. (2024). Unveiling the Shadows of the Maritime Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Shipping Accidents and Preventative Measures. Journal of Maritime Research, 21(3), 91-100.
Mitroussi, K. (2013). Ship management: contemporary developments and implications. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(2), 229-248.
Belabyad, M., Kontovas, C., Pyne, R., & Chang, C. H. (2025). Skills and competencies for operating maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS): a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-26.
Meštrović, T., Pavić, I., Maljković, M., & Androjna, A. (2024). Challenges for the education and training of seafarers in the context of autonomous shipping: Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3173.
Hopcraft, R. (2021). Developing maritime digital competencies. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 5(3), 12-18.
Berlan, B. (2020). Crew change and other present issues. Transactions on Maritime Science, 9(02), 386-388.
Haapasaari, P., Helle, I., Lehikoinen, A., Lappalainen, J., & Kuikka, S. (2015). A proactive approach for maritime safety policy making for the Gulf of Finland: Seeking best practices. Marine policy, 60, 107-118.
Makransky, G., & Klingenberg, S. (2022). Virtual reality enhances safety training in the maritime industry: An organizational training experiment with a non‐WEIRD sample. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 1127-1140.
Kidd, R., & McCarthy, E. (2019). Maritime education in the age of autonomy. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 187, 221-230.
