The Impact of Cargo Volume and Ship Type on Maritime Service Efficiency: A Case Study of Indonesia
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, Indonesia
PT. Buana Lintas Lautan TBK Jakarta
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta, Indonesia
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
Politeknik Pelayaran Banten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62391/ejmi.v7i2.154Ports are a vital element in ensuring the smooth running of trade activities, particularly in the process of loading and unloading goods. The duration of loading and unloading at a port varies from a few hours to several days, depending on the volume and type of cargo, as well as the efficiency of available port facilities and equipment. PT Buana Lintas Lautan Tbk Tanjung Priok branch, which operates in ship agency services, needs to improve service efficiency to overcome this problem. This research aims to evaluate the influence of ship type and volume of cargo on ship turnaround time, as well as analyze the combined impact of these two factors. Using quantitative methods with primary data obtained from documentation and literature studies, as well as data analysis through descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, and linear regression. The research results show that the variables of ship type and volume of cargo simultaneously influence service time with a calculated F value of 16.546 > F table 3.34. However, only the volume of cargo has a significant positive effect on service time, while the type of ship does not show a significant effect. In conclusion, the volume of cargo significantly influences the service time of ship arrival and departure, while the type of ship does not have a significant effect.
Keywords: type of ship volume of cargo turnaround time
H. Johnson and L. Styhre, “Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 71, pp. 167–178, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.008.
M. van der Horst, M. Kort, B. Kuipers, and H. Geerlings, “Coordination problems in container barging in the port of Rotterdam: an institutional analysis,” Transp. Plan. Technol., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 2019, doi: 10.1080/03081060.2019.1565164.
S. Nikghadam, K. F. Molkenboer, L. Tavasszy, and J. Rezaei, “Information sharing to mitigate delays in port: the case of the Port of Rotterdam,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 576–601, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41278-021-00203-9.
W. Shao, P. Zhou, and S. K. Thong, “Development of a novel forward dynamic programming method for weather routing,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 239–251, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00773-011-0152-z.
S. F. Ezzahra, B. Abdelouahad, M. Khalifa, and Q. Mohammed, “Optimizing Port Operations: Synchronization, Collision Avoidance, and Efficient Loading and Unloading Processes,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 613–620, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140768.
Z. Wang, C. Claramunt, and Y. Wang, “Extracting global shipping networks from massive historical automatic identification system sensor data: A bottom-up approach,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 19, no. 15, 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19153363.
I. Rusinov, I. Gavrilova, and A. Bersenev, “Cargo handling processes during containerized shipments: Mathematical modeling, optimality criteria,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 239, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201823903011.
R. Fernandes, F. Braunschweig, F. Lourenço, and R. Neves, “Combining operational models and data into a dynamic vessel risk assessment tool for coastal regions,” Ocean Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 285–317, 2016, doi: 10.5194/os-12-285-2016.
M. Rum, “Cost Efficiency of Sea Freight and Lowering Cost of Consumption Goods,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 156, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/156/1/012020.
G. Fagiolo, J. Reyes, and S. Schiavo, “World-trade web: Topological properties, dynamics, and evolution,” Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.036115.
H. Cahyono and I. N. Pujawan, “Analysis of Empty Containers Supplies in the Shipping Network: Case Study at National Shipping Company,” IPTEK J. Proc. Ser., vol. 0, no. 5, p. 441, 2019, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6390.
B. Susantono, M. A. Berawi, P. Miraj, and J. S. Petroceany, “Improving Logistics Distribution Through Transportation Infrastructure Development in Greater Jakarta,” CSID J. Infrastruct. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 101, 2018, doi: 10.32783/csid-jid.v1i1.13.
M. Alvarez et al., “Intratumoral co-injection of the poly I:C-derivative BO-112 and a STING agonist synergize to achieve local and distant anti-tumor efficacy,” J. Immunother. Cancer, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002953.
